In a surprising turn of events, Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) leader Ajit Pawar's inclusion in the Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA) government in Maharashtra has sparked a range of reactions from party members. NCP MP Supriya Sule and other leaders have expressed their thoughts on the matter, highlighting their perspectives on Ajit Pawar's decision and its implications for the party.
Supriya Sule, daughter of NCP President Sharad Pawar, acknowledged the painful nature of the situation, stating, "Whatever happened is painful. Sharad Pawar treated everyone like a family, and he is our senior leader. I don't think speaking after his statement will be correct." Her remarks reflected the emotional impact of Ajit Pawar's decision on the NCP and the internal dynamics within the party. Sule emphasized the difference between thoughts and hate, underscoring that the NCP has always maintained unity and respect for its members.
Sharad Pawar himself highlighted the democratic nature of the country, stating, "We are living in a democratic country where everyone has the right to speak for themselves and express their viewpoints. Ajit Pawar's move is his own decision and perspective." His statement reaffirmed the principles of democracy while acknowledging the individual agency in political decision-making.
Furthermore, Supriya Sule took a jibe at national investigation agencies, referring to them as "ICE" - Income Tax, CBI, and ED. She criticized the agencies for primarily targeting opposition leaders, although she clarified that she did not hold the officers working there responsible. Sule's comment suggested that these investigations were politically motivated.
Addressing the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), Sule expressed her concerns about the party's constant election-focused mindset. She questioned the BJP's welcoming of NCP leaders, despite previously branding the party as corrupt. Sule, however, stated that she would focus on her work and remain loyal to the NCP and the truth, rather than engaging in the affairs of others. She viewed Ajit Pawar's revolt as a new challenge that she is determined to face.
Meanwhile, NCP leader Jayant Patil revealed that a disqualification petition had been filed against the nine leaders who had defected from the party. Patil expressed disappointment over their departure, as they had not informed anyone beforehand, which contradicted the values of the NCP. He mentioned that they had also written a letter to the Election Commission of India to address the matter. Despite this setback, Patil expressed hope that most of the MLAs would return to the NCP, and the party would welcome them back.
These statements from NCP leaders provide insight into their perspectives on Ajit Pawar's decision and shed light on their commitment to party values. As the situation continues to evolve, Maharashtra's political landscape will undoubtedly experience significant changes. The coming days will reveal the impact of these developments on the NCP and its governance within the MVA government.
