Punjab and Haryana High Court Issues Directive: Tractor Trolleys Prohibited on Highways Amidst Protests

Court Criticizes Large Gatherings at Shambhu Border, Questions Punjab Government's Role
21 February, 24: In a significant development, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has delivered a stern rebuke to protestors stationed at the Shambhu Border, emphasizing that tractor trolleys cannot be utilized on highways, citing provisions under the Motor Vehicle Act. The court's directive comes amidst ongoing protests by farmers, raising concerns over public safety and adherence to legal statutes.

Expressing apprehension over the assembly of farmers in large numbers, the high court questioned the Punjab Government's decision to permit such gatherings, calling attention to the potential risks posed by the presence of tractor-trolleys on highways. The court underscored the importance of upholding the rule of law while safeguarding the fundamental right to protest, subject to reasonable restrictions.

In its statement, the bench highlighted the provisions outlined in the Motor Vehicle Act, which prohibit the use of tractor-trolleys on highways, citing concerns related to traffic safety and regulatory compliance. The court's stance underscores the need for adherence to legal regulations while exercising the right to protest, emphasizing the balance between individual liberties and public order.

"According to the Motor Vehicle Act, you can't use tractor-trolleys on the highway. Right To Protest Subject To Reasonable Restrictions," remarked the bench, reaffirming the principle that fundamental rights must be exercised within the bounds of law and with due regard for public welfare.

The high court's directive serves as a timely reminder of the need for adherence to legal norms and regulatory frameworks, particularly in the context of mass gatherings and public demonstrations. As protests continue to unfold, it is imperative for all stakeholders to prioritize adherence to legal statutes while engaging in peaceful demonstrations, ensuring the preservation of public safety and order.

The court's intervention underscores the judiciary's role in upholding the rule of law and safeguarding constitutional rights, signaling a commitment to ensuring accountability and compliance with legal standards amidst evolving socio-political dynamics.

As the legal proceedings unfold, stakeholders, including protestors, authorities, and civil society, must engage in constructive dialogue and adherence to legal norms, fostering an environment conducive to peaceful expression of dissent while upholding the principles of justice and constitutional governance.