India Protests US Remarks on Kejriwal's Arrest, Recalling Similar Incident with Germany

Diplomatic Row Erupts as US Remarks Draw Ire from Indian Authorities

India Protests US Remarks on Kejriwal's Arrest, Recalling Similar Incident with Germany


New Delhi, 27 March, 24: Tensions between India and the United States escalated after the US State Department commented on the arrest of Indian politician Arvind Kejriwal, sparking a diplomatic dispute reminiscent of a recent incident involving Germany. The US statement, indicating close monitoring of Kejriwal's legal proceedings, drew swift condemnation from Indian authorities, who deemed it as unwarranted interference in the country's domestic affairs.

Expressing concern over the remarks made by the US, India emphasized the need for a fair, transparent, and timely legal process regarding Kejriwal's arrest. The Indian Ministry of External Affairs underscored the importance of respecting the sovereignty and internal affairs of nations, cautioning against any actions that could be perceived as meddling in India's legal processes.

The US statement comes at a sensitive time for bilateral relations, as India had previously objected to similar comments made by Germany regarding internal matters. In response to Germany's remarks, the Indian government summoned the Deputy Chief of Mission in New Delhi, expressing strong opposition to any external interference in domestic affairs.

In a statement issued by the Ministry of External Affairs, India reiterated its position on the matter, highlighting the need for diplomatic respect and non-interference in sovereign affairs. The comments from the US were characterized as akin to interference, prompting India to register its protest and assert its stance on maintaining the integrity of its legal processes.

The diplomatic row underscores the complexities of international relations and the delicate balance between respecting national sovereignty and engaging in diplomatic discourse. As India and the United States navigate this latest dispute, the focus remains on upholding the principles of diplomatic conduct and fostering constructive dialogue to address any underlying concerns.